Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance
- Authors
- C. W. ThornthwaiteJohn R. Mather
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74513249 →Countries where authors are citing Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance
This map shows the geographic impact of Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance
This network shows the impact of Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance.
About Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance
This paper, published in 1955, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by C. W. Thornthwaite and John R. Mather covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (496 citations), Water Science and Technology (360 citations) and Environmental Engineering (228 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74513249.