The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -
- Authors
- Ann P. WoodDP Kelly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74391227 →Countries where authors are citing The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -
This map shows the geographic impact of The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community - with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community - more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -
This network shows the impact of The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -.
About The prokaryotes: an evolving electronic resource for the microbiological community -
This paper, published in 2002, received 828 indexed citations . Written by Ann P. Wood and DP Kelly covering the research area of Ecology and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (341 citations), Molecular Biology (316 citations) and Pollution (155 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74391227.