Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking
- Information Systems and Management
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Authors
- Ralph L. Keeney
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74391214 →Countries where authors are citing Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking
This map shows the geographic impact of Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking
This network shows the impact of Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking.
About Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Ralph L. Keeney covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (453 citations), Economics and Econometrics (220 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (185 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74391214.