Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation
- Journal
- OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7436870 →Countries where authors are citing Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation
This map shows the geographic impact of Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation
This network shows the impact of Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation.
About Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation
This paper, published in 2001, received 10.5k indexed citations . Written by K. Robert Clarke and Richard M. Warwick. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (6.0k citations), Oceanography (4.6k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (4.2k citations). Published in OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7436870.