The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

693 indexed citations
published 1963
Authors
Nigéria
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w73994247 →

Countries where authors are citing The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

About The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

This paper, published in 1963, received 693 indexed citations . Written by Nigéria covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations and General Social Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (217 citations), Sociology and Political Science (204 citations), Political Science and International Relations (163 citations), Economics and Econometrics (102 citations) and General Social Sciences (59 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w73994247.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact