The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience
Impact in
- Authors
- Rex HartsonPardha S. Pyla
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73973917 →Countries where authors are citing The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience
This map shows the geographic impact of The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience
This network shows the impact of The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience.
About The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience
This paper, published in 2012, received 354 indexed citations . Written by Rex Hartson and Pardha S. Pyla. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Human-Computer Interaction (135 citations), Information Systems (59 citations), Sociology and Political Science (52 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (46 citations) and Social Psychology (44 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73973917.