Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization
- Authors
- Geri LoBiondo‐WoodJudith Haber
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73750203 →Countries where authors are citing Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization
This map shows the geographic impact of Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization
This network shows the impact of Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization.
About Nursing Research: Methods Critical Appraisal and Utilization
This paper, published in 2002, received 514 indexed citations . Written by Geri LoBiondo‐Wood and Judith Haber covering the research area of Issues, ethics and legal aspects. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (204 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (104 citations) and Clinical Psychology (78 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73750203.