"Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7365317 →Countries where authors are citing "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008.
This map shows the geographic impact of "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008.
This network shows the impact of "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008..
About "Choking game" awareness and participation among 8th graders - Oregon, 2008.
This paper, published in 2010, received 648 indexed citations . Written by Robert J. Nystrom, Nigel R. Chaumeton and J Gilchrist covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (251 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (177 citations) and Infectious Diseases (144 citations). Published in MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7365317.