Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73382570 →Countries where authors are citing Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness
This map shows the geographic impact of Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness
This network shows the impact of Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness.
About Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness
This paper, published in 1989, received 919 indexed citations . Written by Robert L. Hubbard, Mary Ellen Marsden, J. Valley Rachal, Henrick J. Harwood, Elizabeth R. Cavanaugh and Harold M. Ginzburg. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (727 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (297 citations) and General Health Professions (273 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73382570.