The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma
Impact in
- Authors
- van der Kolk
- Journal
- Penguin Books
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7333480 →Countries where authors are citing The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma
This map shows the geographic impact of The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma
This network shows the impact of The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma.
About The body keeps the score : mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma
This paper, published in 2014, received 323 indexed citations . Written by van der Kolk. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (200 citations), Sociology and Political Science (61 citations), Social Psychology (56 citations), General Health Professions (37 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (33 citations). Published in Penguin Books.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7333480.