Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects.

540 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 540 indexed citations. Written by Barry Winn, David Whitaker, David B. Elliott and N.J. Phillips covering the research area of Epidemiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ophthalmology (251 citations), Epidemiology (205 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (203 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w73325019 →

Countries where authors are citing Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w73325019.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026