Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education

409 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 409 indexed citations. Written by Stephen J. Ball covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (293 citations), Political Science and International Relations (223 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (187 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w73297219 →

Countries where authors are citing Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Education plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w73297219.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026