Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007
- Journal
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73188825 →Countries where authors are citing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007
This map shows the geographic impact of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007
This network shows the impact of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007.
About Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007
This paper, published in 2008, received 549 indexed citations . Written by Niels Bosma, Kelvyn Jones, Erkko Autio and Jonathan Levie. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management of Technology and Innovation (354 citations), Economics and Econometrics (187 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (133 citations). Published in Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73188825.