BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7318674 →Countries where authors are citing BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS
This map shows the geographic impact of BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS more than expected).
Fields of papers citing BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS
This network shows the impact of BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS.
About BITCOIN - ASSET OR CURRENCY? REVEALING USERS' HIDDEN INTENTIONS
This paper, published in 2014, received 332 indexed citations . Written by Florian Glaser, Kai Zimmermann, Martin Haferkorn and Moritz Weber covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (269 citations), Economics and Econometrics (200 citations), Finance (99 citations), Management Information Systems (57 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (35 citations). Published in Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7318674.