Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study.

550 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1979, received 550 indexed citations. Written by Nancy C. Molter covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (494 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (328 citations) and Clinical Psychology (276 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w72717712 →

Countries where authors are citing Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w72717712.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026