Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena.

347 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 347 indexed citations. Written by Clara E. Hill covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (182 citations), Social Psychology (151 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (61 citations). Published in American Psychological Association eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7269947 →

Countries where authors are citing Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7269947.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026