Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research
- Journal
- Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72628607 →Countries where authors are citing Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research
This map shows the geographic impact of Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research
This network shows the impact of Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research.
About Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research
This paper, published in 2017, received 408 indexed citations . Written by Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Christina Maslach and Tadeusz Marek. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (201 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (136 citations) and Social Psychology (123 citations). Published in Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72628607.