The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability
- Journal
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72534767 →Countries where authors are citing The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability
This map shows the geographic impact of The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability
This network shows the impact of The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability.
About The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability
This paper, published in 1998, received 955 indexed citations . Written by Robert T. Watson, Richard H. Moss and David Jon Dokken covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (388 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (191 citations) and Atmospheric Science (187 citations). Published in University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72534767.