Forensic fetal osteology

389 indexed citations
published 1978
Journal
Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7233171 →

Countries where authors are citing Forensic fetal osteology

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forensic fetal osteology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forensic fetal osteology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic fetal osteology more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Forensic fetal osteology

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Forensic fetal osteology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Forensic fetal osteology.

About Forensic fetal osteology

This paper, published in 1978, received 389 indexed citations . Written by István Gyula Fazekas and F Kósa covering the research area of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Archeology (302 citations), Genetics (102 citations), Paleontology (70 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (45 citations) and Anthropology (38 citations). Published in Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7233171.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026