Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms.

551 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 551 indexed citations. Written by David W. Hein, Mark A. Doll, Adrian J. Fretland, Matthew A. Leff, Stephanie J. Webb and Yi Feng covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cancer Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (347 citations), Cancer Research (209 citations) and Oncology (88 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w72311232 →

Countries where authors are citing Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Molecular genetics and epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 acetylation polymorphisms..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w72311232.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026