Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72085246 →Countries where authors are citing Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers
This map shows the geographic impact of Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers
This network shows the impact of Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers.
About Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers
This paper, published in 2006, received 459 indexed citations . Written by Dawson R. Hancock and Robert Algozzine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (185 citations), Sociology and Political Science (79 citations) and Strategy and Management (49 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72085246.