Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations

1.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Tomáš Mikolov, Wen-tau Yih and Geoffrey Zweig covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (1.4k citations), Information Systems (209 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (165 citations). Published in North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7174329 →

Countries where authors are citing Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7174329.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026