Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.
- Authors
- Henderson RhTilak Sundaresan
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w71422513 →Countries where authors are citing Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.
This map shows the geographic impact of Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.
This network shows the impact of Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method..
About Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.
This paper, published in 1982, received 515 indexed citations . Written by Henderson Rh and Tilak Sundaresan covering the research area of Epidemiology and Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health (151 citations), Epidemiology (144 citations) and General Health Professions (115 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w71422513.