What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice

792 indexed citations
published 2000

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w71391166 →

Countries where authors are citing What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice.

About What's Wrong with My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice

This paper, published in 2000, received 792 indexed citations . Written by Jacqueline N. Crawley covering the research area of Genetics and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (330 citations), Molecular Biology (240 citations) and Social Psychology (172 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w71391166.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026