Treatment of error in second language student writing
- Authors
- Dana R. Ferris
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w71352354 →Countries where authors are citing Treatment of error in second language student writing
This map shows the geographic impact of Treatment of error in second language student writing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Treatment of error in second language student writing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Treatment of error in second language student writing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Treatment of error in second language student writing
This network shows the impact of Treatment of error in second language student writing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Treatment of error in second language student writing.
About Treatment of error in second language student writing
This paper, published in 2002, received 426 indexed citations . Written by Dana R. Ferris covering the research area of Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (321 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (246 citations) and Education (240 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w71352354.