Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70906050 →Countries where authors are citing Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering.
This map shows the geographic impact of Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering.
This network shows the impact of Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering..
About Current Concepts in Scaffolding for Bone Tissue Engineering.
This paper, published in 2018, received 306 indexed citations . Written by Azadeh Shahroodi, Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Alireza Mousavian, Jebraeel Movaffagh and Ali Moradi covering the research area of Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (258 citations), Biomaterials (107 citations) and Surgery (84 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70906050.