Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game
- Authors
- Lloyd S. Shapley
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70822198 →Countries where authors are citing Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game
This map shows the geographic impact of Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game
This network shows the impact of Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game.
About Notes on the N-Person Game — II: The Value of an N-Person Game
This paper, published in 1951, received 78 indexed citations . Written by Lloyd S. Shapley covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (23 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (8 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (7 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70822198.