Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations.
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70758293 →Countries where authors are citing Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations.
This map shows the geographic impact of Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations.
This network shows the impact of Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Classification of human epithelia and their neoplasms using monoclonal antibodies to keratins: strategies, applications, and limitations..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70758293.