The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors.

534 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2001, received 534 indexed citations. Written by Yuichi Inoue, Keiko Nakayama, M Shakudo, Michiharu Morino, Kenji Ohata, Kenichi Wakasa and Ryusaku Yamada covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (450 citations), Genetics (261 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (52 citations). Published in American Journal of Neuroradiology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w70736763 →

Countries where authors are citing The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w70736763.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026