How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
- Authors
- Thomas Gilovich
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70463617 →Countries where authors are citing How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
This map shows the geographic impact of How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life more than expected).
Fields of papers citing How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
This network shows the impact of How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life.
About How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
This paper, published in 1991, received 644 indexed citations . Written by Thomas Gilovich. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (196 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (140 citations) and Social Psychology (117 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70463617.