Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution.
- Authors
- Henry Harpending
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70417349 →Countries where authors are citing Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution.
This map shows the geographic impact of Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution.
This network shows the impact of Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution..
About Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution.
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Henry Harpending covering the research area of Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (1.1k citations), Ecology (622 citations) and Molecular Biology (516 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70417349.