Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures

2.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 2.1k indexed citations. Written by Kenneth Holmqvist, Marcus Nyström, R.J. Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka and Joost van de Weijer covering the research area of Human-Computer Interaction. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Human-Computer Interaction (792 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (548 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (497 citations). Published in Lund University Publications (Lund University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w70319647 →

Countries where authors are citing Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Eye tracking a comprehensive guide to methods and measures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w70319647.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026