Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70227880 →Countries where authors are citing Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice.
This map shows the geographic impact of Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice.
This network shows the impact of Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice..
About Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice.
This paper, published in 2007, received 647 indexed citations . Written by Fatih Özbay, Douglas C. Johnson, Charles A. Morgan, Dennis S. Charney and Steven M. Southwick covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (369 citations), Social Psychology (158 citations) and General Health Professions (147 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70227880.