The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
Impact in
- Authors
- E. E. Schattschneider
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70212480 →Countries where authors are citing The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
This map shows the geographic impact of The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
This network shows the impact of The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America.
About The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
This paper, published in 1960, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by E. E. Schattschneider. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (1.5k citations), Sociology and Political Science (791 citations), Strategy and Management (632 citations), Communication (291 citations) and Public Administration (275 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70212480.