ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries
- Authors
- Chin-Yew Lin
- Journal
- Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7013294 →Countries where authors are citing ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries
This map shows the geographic impact of ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries
This network shows the impact of ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries.
About ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries
This paper, published in 2004, received 5.0k indexed citations . Written by Chin-Yew Lin covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (4.3k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.5k citations), Information Systems (532 citations), Molecular Biology (246 citations) and Signal Processing (123 citations). Published in Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7013294.