Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
- Management of Technology and Innovation
- Economics and Econometrics
- Business and International Management
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69902450 →Countries where authors are citing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
This map shows the geographic impact of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global Entrepreneurship Monitor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Entrepreneurship Monitor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
This network shows the impact of Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
About Global Entrepreneurship Monitor
This paper, published in 2002, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Wendy Brown, Laura Galloway and Jonathan Levie covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics and Business and International Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management of Technology and Innovation (1.5k citations), Economics and Econometrics (697 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (671 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69902450.