Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines.
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Authors
- Ruta NonacsLee S. Cohen
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69818121 →Countries where authors are citing Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines.
This map shows the geographic impact of Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines.
This network shows the impact of Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines..
About Postpartum mood disorders: diagnosis and treatment guidelines.
This paper, published in 1998, received 522 indexed citations . Written by Ruta Nonacs and Lee S. Cohen covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (244 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (151 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (134 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69818121.