Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69572344 →Countries where authors are citing Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
This map shows the geographic impact of Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
This network shows the impact of Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
About Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
This paper, published in 2008, received 830 indexed citations . Written by Rafael Harpaz, Ismael R. Ortega‐Sanchez and Jane F. Seward covering the research area of Epidemiology, Health and Hepatology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (577 citations), Infectious Diseases (226 citations) and Microbiology (166 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69572344.