Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection

477 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 477 indexed citations. Written by Richard Socher, Eric Huang, Christopher D. Manning and Andrew Y. Ng covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (416 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (81 citations) and Information Systems (52 citations). Published in Neural Information Processing Systems.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6952099 →

Countries where authors are citing Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dynamic Pooling and Unfolding Recursive Autoencoders for Paraphrase Detection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6952099.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026