Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits
- Authors
- Hugh P. Taylor
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69288298 →Countries where authors are citing Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits
This map shows the geographic impact of Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits
This network shows the impact of Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits.
About Oxygen and hydrogen isotope relationships in hydrothermal mineral deposits
This paper, published in 1997, received 457 indexed citations . Written by Hugh P. Taylor covering the research area of Mechanics of Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (422 citations), Artificial Intelligence (303 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (107 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69288298.