The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods
- Authors
- Norman K. Denzin
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69232868 →Countries where authors are citing The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods
This map shows the geographic impact of The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods
This network shows the impact of The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods.
About The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods
This paper, published in 1970, received 339 indexed citations . Written by Norman K. Denzin. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (95 citations), Education (68 citations) and Strategy and Management (42 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69232868.