Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
- Authors
- Christopher L. Moriarity
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69164072 →Countries where authors are citing Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
This map shows the geographic impact of Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
This network shows the impact of Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004.
About Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
This paper, published in 2000, received 650 indexed citations . Written by Christopher L. Moriarity. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (173 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (135 citations) and Health (131 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69164072.