The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application
- Authors
- J. A. Mandarino
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68972353 →Countries where authors are citing The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application
This map shows the geographic impact of The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application
This network shows the impact of The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application.
About The Gladstone-Dale relationship; Part IV, The compatibility concept and its application
This paper, published in 1981, received 536 indexed citations . Written by J. A. Mandarino. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (471 citations), Materials Chemistry (240 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (168 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68972353.