The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68652288 →Countries where authors are citing The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives
This map shows the geographic impact of The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives
This network shows the impact of The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives.
About The Expanded Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives
This paper, published in 1998, received 521 indexed citations . Written by Elizabeth A. Carter and Monica McGoldrick. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (256 citations), Sociology and Political Science (226 citations) and Social Psychology (161 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68652288.