The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea)
- Authors
- Matthew W. Colbert
- Journal
- Palaeontologia Electronica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6795157 →Countries where authors are citing The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea)
This map shows the geographic impact of The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea)
This network shows the impact of The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea).
About The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene colodon (perissodactyla, tapiroidea)
This paper, published in 2005, received 347 indexed citations . Written by Matthew W. Colbert covering the research area of Paleontology and Anthropology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Paleontology (245 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (84 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (76 citations). Published in Palaeontologia Electronica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6795157.