Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.

2.9k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1969, received 2.9k indexed citations. Written by Ken-Ichi Kojima covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (601 citations), Statistics and Probability (357 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (301 citations). Published in The American Journal of Human Genetics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6783815 →

Countries where authors are citing Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6783815.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026