Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research
- Authors
- Herbert M. Lefcourt
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w67498316 →Countries where authors are citing Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research
This map shows the geographic impact of Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research
This network shows the impact of Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research.
About Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research
This paper, published in 1976, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Herbert M. Lefcourt. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (455 citations), Clinical Psychology (358 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (299 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w67498316.