The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine

1.1k indexed citations
published 2006

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w67379552 →

Countries where authors are citing The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

About The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine

This paper, published in 2006, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Alabama Birmingham covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Reproductive Medicine (694 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (522 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (299 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w67379552.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026