Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice

884 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 884 indexed citations. Written by Gordon Guyatt, Drummond Rennie and Maureen O. Meade covering the research area of General Health Professions. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (289 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (226 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (225 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w66887111 →

Countries where authors are citing Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Users' guides to the medical literature : a manual for evidence-based clinical practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w66887111.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026