Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement

392 indexed citations
published 1994
Authors
Sudhir Anand
Journal
Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6672127 →

Countries where authors are citing Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement.

About Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement

This paper, published in 1994, received 392 indexed citations . Written by Sudhir Anand covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Development. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (171 citations), Economics and Econometrics (132 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (66 citations). Published in Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6672127.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026